Will the Era of Queen Elizabeth II Be Known as the New Elizabethan Age?
When Queen Elizabeth II ascended to the throne in 1952, the term 'New Elizabethan Age' was used to signify the beginning of a new post-WWII era. However, this term quickly fell out of use and was never widely adopted. The period of her reign is now often simply known as the Windsor Era, a name that better reflects the changing times and encompasses the 70-year reign of a modern monarch.
As we enter a new era with her successor, the question of how we will commemorate her reign arises. Some have suggested the term 'New Elizabethan Age' could be revived, but this idea is likely to face significant challenges. Given that Elizabethan is already used to describe the reign of Queen Elizabeth I, and the long gap between the two monarchs, a new term like 'New Windsor Age' or 'Modern Windsor Era' might be more appropriate.
A Post-WWII Renaissance?
The term 'New Elizabethan Age' has its origins in the early 1950s, when Britain was rebuilding after World War II. The new young Queen was seen as a symbol of hope and renewal, much like her predecessor, Queen Elizabeth I. Yet, as time passed, the idea of calling the reign 'Elizabethan' became increasingly inappropriate and confusing. The imagery and cultural context of the 16th and 17th centuries are vastly different from the 21st century, making a direct comparison difficult.
Why the Windsor Era?
The Windsor Era is a more fitting term because it reflects the changing times and the different contexts of each reign. Queen Elizabeth II's era was marked by technological advancements, social changes, and a more diverse society. The name 'Windsor Era' also honors her family name, which is a significant part of British heritage.
Reviving the Term 'New Elizabethan Age'
Some have proposed reviving the term 'New Elizabethan Age' for Queen Elizabeth II's reign, particularly in its early years. The idea is based on the binary classification of eras, with one era named for a monarch who brought about significant changes, and another for the period after them. However, this approach could lead to confusion, especially given the 300-year gap between Queen Elizabeth I and Queen Elizabeth II.
Additionally, the use of 'New Elizabethan Age' has risen in recent times, suggesting that the term is becoming more relevant. It is important to note that the official naming of an era is often a long and formal process, but public perception and usage can play a significant role. If enough people begin to call the period the 'New Elizabethan Age,' it is possible that this term will be formalized.
Regardless of the official term, the period under Queen Elizabeth II will undoubtedly be remembered for its multiculturalism, technological advancements, and the changing role of the monarchy in modern society. The endurance of the British monarchy during her reign has been a testament to its adaptability and enduring popularity. As history progresses, these factors will shape how the period is remembered and named.
Conclusion
The naming of eras is a complex process that involves both historical context and public perception. While the term 'New Elizabethan Age' has been discussed, the more likely and practical term will be 'Windsor Era.' This name reflects the changing times and the significant role the monarchy played during Queen Elizabeth II's reign. However, as time passes, the term could become less formal and more informal, potentially leading to periods being named after the reign of the monarch in question.