Why Western Right-Wingers Often Oppose Islam Despite It Teaching Right-Wing Values
The relationship between right-wing political movements and Islam is often a subject of complex analysis. Despite Islam being a religion that aligns with some right-wing values, a significant portion of right-wingers in Western countries view it with suspicion and opposition. This article explores the underlying reasons for this paradox, examining the historical context, core values, and identity constructs that shape this dynamic.
Historical Context and the September 11 Attacks
The foundation of this opposition was laid by significant events in history, particularly the September 11 attacks in 2001. Before this event, Islam had been largely perceived as an ordinary Abrahamic religion, largely similar to Christianity. However, the events of 9/11 shifted perceptions dramatically. The attacks were not just seen as a terrorist act, but were perceived through the lens of a religious and ideological conflict, positioning Islam as a threat to Western societies and values.
This shift in perception is a key factor in the opposition, as the attacks were not just recognized as a human tragedy, but as a clear affront to the principles of freedom, democracy, and human rights that Western countries hold dear. The image of Islam as a values-based enemy is now deeply entrenched in the minds of many, overriding any potential shared values.
Rights-Wingers and Core Values of Exclusion
The opposition to Islam among right-wingers also stems from the core values of their movement, which is built on the concept of exclusion. Right-wing ideologies often exist in opposition to those who are different, and this leads to a categorization of Islam as a group that is inherently different and potentially threatening. For example, the Boko Haram movement, although Islamist, is often described as right-wing in orientation due to its opposition to Western culture, which can be seen as a form of exclusion.
To Western right-wingers, the Bearded mullahs, women in abayas, and the practice of fasting and Shariah law represent religious practices that are alien to their own understanding of identity and values. Even when some shared values on modesty and defined gender roles exist, the broader cultural and ideological differences are seen as more significant and threatening.
Western Conservative Perspectives and Perceptions
While some might argue that the term "conservative" is more apt than "right-wing" in this context, the underlying issues are similar. Many conservatives value traditional values such as modesty, chastity, and defined gender roles. However, the association of Islam with the hijab and other cultural markers often overshadows these shared values. Cultural differences such as the preference for modernity, rejection of harsh and punitive rules, and a fundamental difference in worldviews can make Islam seem to be an outlier among Western populations.
Conservatives often hold modern values and practices, such as driving cars and upholding individual freedoms, which are in contrast to some of the strict interpretations and practices of Islam. The idea of Shariah law, for instance, is seen as a threat to the existing legal and societal systems in Western countries. Additionally, the perception of Islam as a regime of repression and hatred, rather than as a religion with its own complex history, further reinforces the opposition.
Conclusion: Identity and In-Group/Out-Group Dynamics
The opposition to Islam among Western right-wingers is a complex interplay of historical events, core ideological values, and identity constructs. The September 11 attacks have deeply entrenched Islam as a perceived threat to Western values and security, while the core values of exclusion and in-group/out-group dynamics further reinforce this opposition. Shared cultural and religious values are often overshadowed by broader cultural and ideological differences, leading to the persistent opposition even when some right-wing values are indeed present.
Understanding these dynamics is crucial for fostering dialogue and mutual respect between different cultural and religious groups. It’s essential to recognize the nuanced nature of these beliefs and the context in which they arise, in order to promote a more inclusive and tolerant society.